Under the situation of economic globalization, it is no denying that the competition among all kinds of industries have become increasingly intensified (NetSec-Analyst exam simulation: Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst), especially the IT industry, there are more and more IT workers all over the world, and the professional knowledge of IT industry is changing with each passing day. Under the circumstances, it is really necessary for you to take part in the Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst exam and try your best to get the IT certification, but there are only a few study materials for the IT exam, which makes the exam much harder for IT workers. Now, here comes the good news for you. Our company has committed to compile the NetSec-Analyst study guide materials for IT workers during the 10 years, and we have achieved a lot, we are happy to share our fruits with you in here.

Convenience for reading and printing

In our website, there are three versions of NetSec-Analyst exam simulation: Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst for you to choose from namely, PDF Version, PC version and APP version, you can choose to download any one of NetSec-Analyst study guide materials as you like. Just as you know, the PDF version is convenient for you to read and print, since all of the useful study resources for IT exam are included in our Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst exam preparation, we ensure that you can pass the IT exam and get the IT certification successfully with the help of our NetSec-Analyst practice questions.

No help, full refund

Our company is committed to help all of our customers to pass Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst as well as obtaining the IT certification successfully, but if you fail exam unfortunately, we will promise you full refund on condition that you show your failed report card to us. In the matter of fact, from the feedbacks of our customers the pass rate has reached 98% to 100%, so you really don't need to worry about that. Our NetSec-Analyst exam simulation: Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst sell well in many countries and enjoy high reputation in the world market, so you have every reason to believe that our NetSec-Analyst study guide materials will help you a lot.

We believe that you can tell from our attitudes towards full refund that how confident we are about our products. Therefore, there will be no risk of your property for you to choose our NetSec-Analyst exam simulation: Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst, and our company will definitely guarantee your success as long as you practice all of the questions in our NetSec-Analyst study guide materials. Facts speak louder than words, our exam preparations are really worth of your attention, you might as well have a try.

After purchase, Instant Download: Upon successful payment, Our systems will automatically send the product you have purchased to your mailbox by email. (If not received within 12 hours, please contact us. Note: don't forget to check your spam.)

Free demo before buying

We are so proud of high quality of our NetSec-Analyst exam simulation: Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst, and we would like to invite you to have a try, so please feel free to download the free demo in the website, we firmly believe that you will be attracted by the useful contents in our NetSec-Analyst study guide materials. There are all essences for the IT exam in our Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst exam questions, which can definitely help you to passed the IT exam and get the IT certification easily.

Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst Sample Questions:

1. An organization wants to create a custom URL category for a list of highly sensitive internal web applications that should only be accessible from specific internal subnets. However, these applications are accessed via FQDNs that share a common, publicly resolvable root domain (e.g., 'appl.corp.example.com', 'app2.corp.example.com' , 'finance.corp.example.com'). The challenge is that .corp.example.com' is also used by many other public-facing services, and blocking the entire 'corp.example.com' domain would cause significant business disruption. The security team needs to precisely define the custom URL category to include only appl.corp.example.com' , 'app2.corp.example.com' , and 'finance.corp.example.com' , without affecting other subdomains, and then apply a strict access policy. Which configuration approach for the custom URL category is most precise and least prone to false positives, assuming other subdomains like 'public.corp.example.com' or 'dev.corp.example.com' exist and should not be included?

A)

B)

C)

D)

E)

2. A security operations center (SOC) needs to automate the blocking of IP addresses identified by their SIEM as malicious. They use Palo Alto Networks Panorama for central management. The automation should dynamically update a Block List custom URL category, which is then referenced by a security policy. Which of the following automation workflows using Panorama and its APIs would be the most robust and scalable?

A) The SIEM exports a CSV of malicious IPs. A script on a management server periodically reads this CSV and uses the Panorama CLI to add entries to the custom URL category.
B) A cron job on the Panorama appliance itself executes a script that directly modifies the configuration files based on SIEM alerts.
C) Configure all firewalls to forward logs directly to the SIEM, and the SIEM will automatically block malicious IPs without Panorama intervention.
D) Manually create a new Security Policy Rule for each malicious IP address identified by the SIEM, then commit and push.
E) The SIEM triggers a webhook to a Cloud Function. This function uses the Panorama XML API to add new IP addresses to a custom URL category object, followed by a 'commit' and 'push' operation.

3. A Security Architect is designing a new firewall policy for a cloud environment where applications communicate using REST APIs over HTTP/S. They need to ensure that API traffic is strictly controlled and protected. Specifically, they want to: 1 . Allow only specific API methods (e.g., GET, POST, PUT) and block others (e.g., DELETE, TRACE) unless explicitly authorized. 2. Inspect API payloads for XML/JSON injection attacks and enforce schema validation. 3. Prevent file uploads larger than IOMB to API endpoints. 4. Log all successful API calls and block/log all denied calls. Which combination of Security Profiles and features should be used, and how are they applied to achieve this?

A) Leverage a custom URL Category for 'allowed-api-methods' and 'blocked-api-methods' within a URL Filtering profile. Use a Data Filtering profile to enforce schema validation and detect injection, and a separate File Blocking profile for upload size. Apply all of these within a Security Profile Group to the API policy rule. Ensure session logging is enabled on the rule.
B) Configure an HTTP Header Insertion Profile to enforce allowed methods. Use a Vulnerability Protection profile with specific attack signatures and a custom Data Pattern in a Data Filtering profile for schema validation of API payloads (e.g., regex for required fields). Utilize a File Blocking profile for size limits. Apply these through a Security Profile Group to the API security policy rule. Create a custom URL category for each API endpoint to apply granular controls.
C) Define a Security Policy Rule that explicitly allows HTTP/S traffic to API endpoints. Within the 'Application' section of this rule, use 'http-method' application filters (e.g., allow 'http-get', 'http-post'). Apply a Vulnerability Protection profile with signatures for injection attacks. Use a File Blocking profile for upload size limits. For payload inspection and schema validation, configure a Data Filtering profile with custom regex patterns for the expected API structure. Attach all to a Security Profile Group on the API rule.
D) Create a custom application for API traffic. Define a custom signature for HTTP methods within the Threat Prevention profile (Vulnerability Protection) to block specific methods. Use a Vulnerability Protection profile with signatures for XML/JSON injection and a File Blocking profile for upload size. Data Filtering for schema validation is not natively supported for XML/JSON. Ensure logging on the security rule.
E) Create a URL Filtering profile to block unwanted HTTP methods. Use a Vulnerability Protection profile to detect XML/JSON injection. Configure a File Blocking profile to limit upload sizes. Apply these to a Security Profile Group on the API security policy rule. Logging is default.

4. A Palo Alto Networks firewall is configured with an SD-WAN profile. An administrator is observing that certain critical applications (e.g., 'SAP ERP') are not consistently using the 'Best Quality' path as defined in their SD-WAN policy rule, even when the preferred link's metrics are within the 'Good' threshold defined by the associated 'Path Quality' profile. Other traffic appears to be load-balancing correctly. What are the MOST likely reasons for this unexpected behavior?

A) The 'Best Quality' path selection method prioritizes links based on the lowest aggregated latency, jitter, and packet loss. If another link, even if not the 'preferred' one, consistently reports slightly better overall quality, the traffic will use that link.
B) The 'Path Quality' profile associated with the 'SAP ERP' rule has its 'Good' thresholds set too loosely, causing fluctuations in link quality to be still considered 'Good' when they might not be optimal for SAP.
C) The 'Path Monitoring' profile for the preferred link is incorrectly configured or disabled, preventing real-time quality metrics from being updated, thus the SD-WAN engine cannot accurately determine 'Best Quality'.
D) The application 'SAP_ERP' is incorrectly identified by App-ID, leading it to be matched by a different, less specific SD-WAN policy rule.
E) The SD-WAN policy rule for 'SAP_ERP' might be positioned below a broader 'any-any' rule with 'Session Distribution' load balancing, causing the critical traffic to be caught by the generic rule first.

5. A financial institution requires an SD-WAN deployment where all transactions over a custom application 'Financial_Tx' must utilize the MPLS link if available, but strict data sovereignty laws dictate that this traffic must never traverse a public internet link. Other applications have more flexible routing. How would you configure the SD-WAN profile and associated elements to enforce this stringent requirement, minimizing the risk of 'Financial_Tx' ever using the internet path, while allowing dynamic failover within the MPLS realm?

A) Implement an SD-WAN profile with a policy rule for 'Financial_Tx'. In the 'Path Selection' section, use 'Preferred Path' and explicitly add only the MPLS SD-WAN link(s). Do not add any internet-based SD-WAN links to this rule's 'Applicable Paths' or 'Preferred Path' list.
B) Create an SD-WAN policy rule for 'Financial_Tx' with 'Performance-Based' path selection. Define a 'Path Quality' profile for MPLS with aggressive SLA thresholds. For the internet link, configure a 'Path Monitoring' profile that always reports 'Bad' quality for the internet link when 'Financial_Tx' is detected.
C) Configure an SD-WAN policy rule for 'Financial_Tx'. Use 'Active/Backup' path selection, with the MPLS link as 'Active' and the internet link as 'Backup'. Additionally, create a security policy rule above this SD-WAN rule to block 'Financial_Tx' traffic if its egress interface is the internet-facing one.
D) Use a PBF (Policy Based Forwarding) rule for 'Financial_Tx' to explicitly forward traffic out the MPLS interface. Use an SLA monitoring profile for the MPLS link to trigger a 'Deny' PBF rule if the MPLS link goes down, effectively dropping 'Financial_Tx' traffic rather than sending it over the internet.
E) Define two SD-WAN profiles: one for 'Financial_Tx' with only MPLS links configured as active SD-WAN members, and another profile for other traffic including both MPLS and Internet links. Assign the 'Financial_Tx' profile to a separate virtual router only handling this traffic.

Solutions: